Thompson Legal Transforms Discovery Document Preparation
How a boutique litigation firm cut document redaction time by 85% while protecting client confidentiality across thousands of discovery documents.
About Thompson Legal Group
Thompson Legal Group is a boutique litigation firm in Denver, Colorado, specializing in employment law, civil rights cases, and government accountability litigation. Founded by Marcus Thompson in 2015, the firm has built a reputation for taking on complex cases involving public records and FOIA requests.
With 8 attorneys and 6 support staff, Thompson Legal handles high-volume discovery that often involves thousands of pages of documents containing sensitive personal information about plaintiffs, witnesses, and third parties.
Quick Facts
- IndustryLegal Services
- Firm Size14 employees
- LocationDenver, CO
- SpecialtyEmployment & Civil Rights
The Challenge
Employment litigation generates massive document volumes. A typical wrongful termination case at Thompson Legal might involve personnel files, email chains, performance reviews, and internal investigations—often totaling thousands of pages. Before producing these documents in discovery, the firm must redact information about uninvolved employees, Social Security numbers, medical information, and other protected data.
"We had a case last year with over 4,000 pages of HR documents," recalls Marcus Thompson, the firm's founding partner. "Our paralegals spent three weeks—nearly 120 billable hours—just on redaction. That's time we couldn't bill to the client and attorneys we couldn't assign to case strategy."
Key Pain Points
- •Discovery deadlines missed due to redaction backlogs
- •$350/hour paralegal time spent on repetitive redaction
- •Risk of inadvertent disclosure of privileged information
- •Inconsistent redaction standards across team members
The firm had tried contract document review services, but the cost was prohibitive for a boutique firm, and sending client documents to third-party reviewers raised confidentiality concerns. They also evaluated e-discovery platforms with built-in redaction, but these required expensive annual licenses and complex implementations.
"We needed something our paralegals could use immediately without training, that wouldn't require us to upload confidential client documents to someone else's servers, and that actually worked," Marcus explains.
The Solution
A paralegal at Thompson Legal discovered SafeRedact while researching FOIA redaction tools for a government accountability case. The browser-based architecture immediately solved the firm's confidentiality concerns.
Why SafeRedact
- ✓Client confidentiality: Documents never leave the paralegal's browser
- ✓AI accuracy: Catches names, SSNs, and contextual PII that manual review misses
- ✓No training needed: Paralegals productive within minutes
- ✓Flexible pricing: Day passes for high-volume discovery pushes
"The day pass option was actually a big deal for us," Marcus notes. "We don't have constant redaction needs—it comes in waves around discovery deadlines. Being able to buy a day pass when we have a document production due, rather than paying for a year-round subscription, fit our workflow perfectly."
The firm now uses SafeRedact's annual subscription for routine work and adds day passes during major discovery productions when multiple team members need simultaneous access.
The Results
Before SafeRedact
- ✗15-20 min per document
- ✗$52K+ annual paralegal time
- ✗Discovery deadline extensions
- ✗Inconsistent redaction quality
After SafeRedact
- ✓2-3 min per document
- ✓$5K annual tool cost
- ✓All deadlines met
- ✓Consistent AI-powered detection
In the first year, Thompson Legal processed over 3,200 documents through SafeRedact. The time savings translated directly to the bottom line: paralegal hours previously spent on manual redaction could now be billed to substantive case work.
"We calculated $47,000 in annual savings when you factor in paralegal time and the cost of the tool," Marcus says. "But the real value is in meeting our discovery obligations without the stress. We haven't requested a single deadline extension for document production since we started using SafeRedact."
The firm has also found unexpected benefits in quality control. "The AI catches things our manual process missed—like when someone's name appears in an email signature we'd scroll past, or a phone number in the middle of a paragraph. Our redactions are more thorough now than when we did everything by hand."
"In litigation, document production deadlines are non-negotiable. SafeRedact turned our biggest bottleneck into a non-issue. The fact that our client documents never leave the browser means I don't have to worry about adding another data security risk to our practice."
Key Takeaways
$47K Saved
Annual cost savings vs. manual redaction
100% On Time
All discovery deadlines met
3,200+ Docs
Processed in first year
Ready to Streamline Your Document Production?
See how SafeRedact can help your firm meet discovery deadlines without the redaction bottleneck.